Thursday, August 18, 2011

Anna Hazare – a Messiah or a Ticking Time Bomb?


We Indians are always known for holding extreme views, and emotions not laced by “pure reason” (as Tagore calls it in Gitanjali). From worshipping our cricketers to burning their houses, from acts of honour during the Kargil war to the 3G Scam.
I am afraid many of those in that rally, proclaiming “I am Anna”, “mein Bhi Anna”, don’t have a clue as to the difference between the Lokpal bill as passed in the Parliament, and the Jan Lokpal bill. Are the youth wrong? Not at all. The youth in any country and era, always wants a cause to attach themselves to. The Indian Government, if it had the leadership to move the country ahead to become a world super power, then that passion would have ignited the young minds to rally around that cause. But alas there is none!
Now Anna arrives on the scene, as a (seemingly) affable old man. Only if the young people knew that the same Anna had in his village flogged two young people for drinking alcohol, banned liquor shops there, regulated TV time, and almost forced people to lead a pious life. Once a driver in the Indian Army, Anna, has now risen to this stature from his own conviction. But unlike Gandhi who never used fasting like an antagonistic tool, Anna is using it to fight adversaries. Anna must remain rigid against Govt attitude but flexible to diverse views. That is the essence of democracy.
So will I not join the rally? Yes I did join the rally. But for me Anna is only a reason. Anna is living his convictions and fighting corruption. We must commend him for rising to the occasion. But even he never would have expected this kind of support he is getting, just as he did not expect such ineptitude on the part of the govt. Why this kind of support? The support is for the cause more than support for Anna, who is revered for being the reason of it.
Some people are asking, whether the Anna movement has dented the Indian image of a democratic nation? In fact to the contrary, it is an emphatic affirmation that democracy in India is truly alive. Thousands came to the street, but all non-violently, for a country where the mob at the smallest provocation torch buses.
Anna has put Corruption on red alert. This is fabulous. Decades ago as a young man in Kerala I heard a wonderful speaker and Gandhian, M P Manmadhan. Even in the 70s he spoke of the curse of corruption. He said the difference between corruption of old and of new, was that in the olden days there was“sourness” (pulip -“sourness” in Malayalam) when it was done. But now there was no sourness, it had become a matter of course. I agonized always, over whether my sons would grow up thinking corruption is ok? Anna has held up the mirror to our faces. At least the sourness is back.
But then that is it. It ends there. I don’t agree to the Jan Lokpal bill being greater than the parliament. Then who will be the Lokpal of the Lokpal?  Anna is saying that impeccable humans will be chosen to head the Lokpal. This is untenable. There is no perfect human. Only Collectively we check and balance.
 I would like every government official to come under the Lokpal bill. Put all the investigating agencies under the Lokpal and then let all findings be sent to the parliament to decide, for major issues.
But what about the small local cases of corruption, who will control and monitor? I don’t know yet.
But let’s give Anna his due and thank him for bringing back the sourness and stirring up the pot. But he needs to be flexible to “listen” to other views from similar crusaders. Let not the situation get reverse engineered- let not public’s misconceived ideas of the Lokpal bill become a burden on Anna himself. Let not Anna be in the situation of Deva Anand in the film “Guide”. Let not his cause become his nemesis. Let us not turn Anna into a time bomb. 

7 comments:

  1. Isnt it important that the youth is fighting (or raising concern) against corruption? Why do we need to know the difference between the bills? To me, as you have stated, the goood thing is mass movement against corruption and non-violent way of taking it up (and the Police also needs to get the credit here).
    But good points. My point is - is this going to be taken to the logical end??

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dupi, agree. The important aspect is realisation, the rest is detail. But this detail ( the final bill), is what is really important. I think the way this will happen is that Govt will get a combined group to modify the LP bill passed in the Parliament. But i fear like you do, if it will take the right form. I am an optimist.i think you are too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Radha,

    I agree with most of your views especially the one related to I am joining the rally against corruption and not in favor of Anna or JanLokpal.

    I really dont think one bill is the magic wand which can reverse the corruption index.

    In my view this unrest is important from 2 reasons -
    1. Awareness among people (during this tenure i don't think anyone will dare ask / give bribe). It will surely sustain.
    2. Creating an example in front of the whole world that we are a true democracy.

    Now, coming to my views on Lokpal.
    1. I think it is important that this bill should be discussed openly in parliament where whole country can watch (with special invitation to Anna and his team), and then take a call. But, I still feel it will not more than a humble beginning, which is an imperative rather than a choice.

    2. The root cause lies in the lack of transparency/ awareness in policy execution processes that the government has laid down ages ago. We need to attack there first. e.g. we do not know how much time after applying for a renewal of passport we'll get the same. We are at the mercy of the counter lady, the policemen who does verification and finally the releasing authority. Everyone has a different version and list of issues. I am using this as an example (passport authority has been very efficient lately).
    As Nandan Nilekani said (poor guy was bashed up once he said this is not the solution), make the processes so transparent and simple that everyone is aware of what is expected and create right escalation mechanisms. Coming back to my example, in case I know that I will get my passport in 7 days and if I don't get it, I can approach the following authorities with names / numbers, it will help.
    3. Last but not the least point, is about process improvement. Mere process awareness will not work, the government should invest a lot on improving the processes. A third party can be put in place to monitor / review government on achievement on certain metrics and provide ratings, which can not only decide poll outputs but can also help in getting investments from abroad.

    Guess i just vented out some stuff. Thanks for your blog, its enriching.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rajat. Solid views. You know what, all corruption starts at home. Parents have to tell their wards the difference between right and wrong. On my way to office, i saw a man on a two wheeler with two school going kids, cutting the red light and going down a one way lane. It starts here. That partents must show how they favour being correct. This is not talking of lofty speeches to kids. Let Piety start at home.
    your point on process is so critical. But we have a lot of laws and processes, only they are not followed.Thanks for your comments.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi. Agree. If all the Indians respect the established processes(developed with the users in mind)and trust that the laws have been framed for common good, all other things around us will be more aligned.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kaash....legislation can be the solution for such 'accepted norms' of corruption among us...A law can't be a substitute for decreased moral values...Good is that 'these candles may bring light to enlighten us'

    ReplyDelete
  7. Raghavan and Anurag,We should not credit the human species with doing what is right. From the life of cavemen, we have been self seeking. The only thing that makes us behave well in public is fear of punishment. Why is the Army so disciplined and a contrast to the rest of Indian public life? It is because they fear reprimand for non compliance. What our public life lacks is a strong executive, the police, lower level judiciary.

    ReplyDelete